Comparison
ScaFix vs Excel for scaffold take-offs
Most scaffold quotes still start in a spreadsheet. This page takes one house, 11.4 m by 5.3 m with 2 gables, and shows what the ScaFix engine counts for it in Layher Allround, wall by wall, next to what an Excel take-off has to work out by formula or by hand. Written by the maker of ScaFix, one of the tools compared. Excel facts come from Microsoft Support and the house's numbers from the ScaFix engine, read and computed on 25 October 2026; corrections to support@scafix.app.
By Ole Emil Frikstad Urstad · How the numbers are computed ·

Is Excel or ScaFix better for a scaffold take-off?
Excel is better when you already trust your parts list and only need your own rates, margins and layout around it. ScaFix is better when the list itself is the risk: on the example house it splits 4 walls into 12 bays and counts 515 pieces on 17 part lines from the model, including gables, corners and deck levels.
ScaFix and an Excel take-off side by side
| ScaFix | Excel take-off sheet | Checked | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Scaffold planning software: walls in, a 3D scaffold and its parts list out | A general spreadsheet; the scaffold logic is whatever formulas the sheet's author wrote | 25 October 2026 |
| Runs on | Browser (PC, Mac, Android) and a native iPhone app, one account; nothing to install on a computer | Windows and macOS (Excel for Microsoft 365 and Excel 2016–2024, as Microsoft Support lists them) | 25 October 2026 |
| How a plan starts | Wall lengths and heights typed in, a PDF floor plan, or a LiDAR scan with the iPhone app | Empty cells or a template someone built; wall lengths are typed into rows | 25 October 2026 |
| Scaffold systems | 108 systems from 56 manufacturers in one picker (frame, modular/ringlock, cuplock and others) | Only the systems, bay lengths and part names the author typed in | 25 October 2026 |
| Bays and corners | The engine chooses whole bays per wall from the system's bay lengths (12 bays on the example house) | A formula such as wall length ÷ bay length, rounded by a rule the author picked, or typed per wall | 25 October 2026 |
| Gables and heights | Each wall keeps its own height; gable walls are computed to the ridge | One height per row unless the sheet has a column per frame line | 25 October 2026 |
| Structural check | None: a planning aid, not a structural calculation or approval | None | 25 October 2026 |
| What you get | 3D model and a complete parts list; CSV or Excel export and a PDF quote in Pro | The numbers the formulas give, in the layout the firm chose; no 3D model | 25 October 2026 |
| Versions | One saved project per job in the account; the parts list is computed again from the model | Version history only when the file is stored in OneDrive or SharePoint (Microsoft Support) | 25 October 2026 |
| Decimal commas | Measurements accept both a comma and a dot | Excel uses the separators of the computer's regional settings by default (Microsoft Support) | 25 October 2026 |
| Price | Weekly Pro subscription, or yearly Basic Light, Basic and Pro plans; amounts below, from the price list | Not compared: Microsoft's product page could not be read for this page | 25 October 2026 |
The example house, wall by wall
| Wall | Length | Height | Gable | Bays from the engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.4 m | 4.5 m | No | 3.07 m + 3.07 m + 3.07 m + 3.07 m |
| 2 | 5.3 m | 6 m | Yes | 3.07 m + 3.07 m |
| 3 | 11.4 m | 4.5 m | No | 3.07 m + 3.07 m + 3.07 m + 3.07 m |
| 4 | 5.3 m | 6 m | Yes | 3.07 m + 3.07 m |
What the engine counts for the same house
| Part group | Part lines | Pieces |
|---|---|---|
| Frames and standards | 2 | 96 |
| Ledgers and beams | 2 | 120 |
| Decks | 3 | 59 |
| Guardrails | 1 | 72 |
| Toeboards | 1 | 24 |
| Diagonals | 1 | 8 |
| Ends | 2 | 16 |
| Wall ties and fittings | 3 | 56 |
| Base jacks and legs | 2 | 64 |
| Total | 17 | 515 |
What a spreadsheet has to get right on this house
Start with the walls table. The house has 4 walls, and each one gets whole bays whose lengths add up to at least the wall itself, so the scaffold reaches to the wall’s end or past it. A sheet that divides the wall length by the bay length must round in the same direction every time, and must know which bay lengths the system actually has. Round down once and a bay of decks, guardrails and toeboards is missing from the lorry.
Then the gables. 2 of the walls end in a gable that rises to 6 m, while the eaves walls stop at 4.5 m. A take-off sheet with one height per wall either scaffolds the whole gable wall to the ridge, which over-orders, or to the eaves, which leaves the top of the gable without a working level. The engine keeps each wall's own height and builds the gable wall up to the ridge.
Then the levels. The engine puts decks on 2 levels of this house. Each deck level adds decks, guardrails and toeboards on every bay, and a sheet that keys them to the number of lifts must also know which lifts carry a deck and which only carry the frame.
Where the pieces come from
The second table is the point of the comparison. For this one house the engine writes 17 part lines in 9 groups, 515 pieces in all: frames or standards, ledgers, decks, guardrails, toeboards, bracing, end guardrails, ties and base jacks, each by length. A spreadsheet can hold that list, and many firms keep exactly such a list. What it cannot do on its own is derive it from the walls: every line is a rule written by someone, and every rule has to be right for every wall shape the sheet will ever see.
That is where spreadsheets are known to fail. In Ray Panko's summary of spreadsheet audits, the five audits with the strongest methods examined 55 operational spreadsheets and found important errors in 91 % of them. The studies are not about scaffolding, but a take-off sheet is the same kind of file: formulas copied down rows, edited by several people, and trusted because the totals look plausible.
What Excel still does better
Excel is transparent: every number sits in a cell you can click, and nothing is hidden behind a vendor's rules. It holds your own labour rates, hire per week, transport per load and margin, and you can change them in seconds. Everyone in the office already knows it. And it is the format almost every tool ends in: ScaFix itself exports its parts list as CSV or Excel in Pro, precisely so that the list can go into the firm's own pricing sheet.
So the honest choice is rarely Excel or software. It is where the counting happens: in formulas that guess the bays and the levels, or in a model of the walls that the spreadsheet then prices.
Commas, copies and versions
Two practical traps are worth naming. Microsoft Support says Excel uses the separators of the computer's regional settings by default, so a sheet built on a Norwegian or German PC with decimal commas can read differently on an English one. And Excel keeps a version history only for files stored in OneDrive or SharePoint; a take-off saved to a desktop or sent as an attachment has none, and three copies of the same job soon disagree.
ScaFix accepts both a comma and a dot in measurements, and keeps one project per job in the account, with the parts list computed again from the model each time it is opened.
Keep the Excel sheet if…
- your jobs are straight walls in one system, and the sheet's rules have proven themselves on them;
- you already have a trusted parts list and only need rates, margins and your own quote layout;
- you scaffold with tube and fittings, which ScaFix does not model;
- nobody else needs to open the take-off, and you keep one copy of it.
Use ScaFix if…
- the houses have gables, corners and walls of different heights;
- you want the parts list counted from the walls, not from rules in cells;
- you plan in several systems and want each one's own bay lengths and parts;
- you want to send the list on to your pricing sheet as CSV or Excel (Pro).
What ScaFix does not do
- No structural calculation or approval: ScaFix is a planning aid, not structural approval.
- No pricing model of your own: labour, hire and margin stay in your sheet or quote.
- No tube-and-fitting scaffolds.
- No free plan.

What ScaFix costs
From ScaFix's own price list: the first week of Pro costs €0.98, then €9.98 a week until you cancel (cancel in the first week and access ends at once). The yearly plans cost €39.90 (Basic Light), €79.90 (Basic) and €149.90 (Pro) a year. Rounded corners, silos, hanging scaffolds, hoists and mobile and stair towers are Pro only.
Questions and answers
Can I build a scaffold take-off in Excel?
Yes, and many firms do. The sheet must turn wall lengths into whole bays of the system's real lengths, handle gable heights and deck levels, and keep every part line's formula right. On the example house that is 17 part lines and 515 pieces.
How many parts does the example house need?
In the ScaFix engine, the 11.4 m × 5.3 m house with 2 gables comes to 515 pieces on 17 part lines in 9 groups, in Layher Allround. The tables on this page show the walls and the groups.
Does ScaFix export to Excel?
Yes. In Pro, ScaFix exports the parts list as CSV or Excel and the quote as PDF, so the list can be priced in your own spreadsheet.
Why do take-off spreadsheets go wrong?
Mostly through formulas: rounding a bay the wrong way, one height for a gable wall, a copied row that points at the wrong cell. Audits of business spreadsheets summarised by Ray Panko found important errors in 91 % of 55 spreadsheets.
Does Excel keep old versions of my take-off?
Only when the file is stored in OneDrive or SharePoint, according to Microsoft Support. A file saved locally or sent as an attachment has no version history.
Sources
Microsoft Support on version history and on decimal and thousands separators, and Ray Panko's summary of spreadsheet audits, read on 25 October 2026. The house's numbers are computed by the ScaFix engine when the page is built.
Try one week – €0.98See the demo house in 3DSee ScaFix
First week €0.98, then €9.98/week. Full Pro. Cancel anytime.