Safety
How often must scaffolding be inspected? Nine countries compared
Every country checks a scaffold before first use and names storms or alterations as reasons to check again. The differences are in the calendar, the length of a break that forces a new check, who signs and what paper is left behind.
By Ole Emil Frikstad Urstad · How the numbers are computed ·

How often must scaffolding be inspected?
All nine require a check before first use and after storms or alterations. The routine interval varies: every work shift in the US (29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3)), daily plus a thorough check every three months in France, every 7 days in the UK (WAHR reg. 12), monthly in Poland, while Norway, Sweden and Germany set triggers instead of a calendar.
How often must scaffolding be inspected in each country?
Each cell paraphrases the clause in the last column.
| Country | Before first use | Routine interval | After weather or alteration | After a break in use | Who inspects | Record or tag | Clause |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Yes, in position | Within the previous 7 days (2 m fall, construction) | High winds and other exceptional events; HSE adds substantial alteration | No own rule; the 7 days decide | Competent person | Schedule 7 report, copy within 24 h, kept on site, then 3 months | WAHR 2005 reg. 12 |
| US | Before the first shift | Every work shift | Any occurrence affecting structural integrity | Covered by the shift check | Competent person | No form prescribed | 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3) |
| Norway | Yes | Regular, suited to conditions | Bad weather, anything weakening stability | Unused a week or more | Kvalifisert person | Report (§ 17-10); sign with last date and inspector (§ 17-11) | § 17-9 |
| Sweden | Erector when ready, user before use | Continuously | Strong wind, weather, unforeseen events, stressed within the continuous check (§ 37) | Unused "a longer time" | Erecting, then user's employer | Erector's documented check, handed over | AFS 2023:11 ch. 8, 32–37 §§ |
| Denmark | Yes | Maker's interval, else at least every 12 months | Changes, accidents, natural events | Longer standstill | Sagkyndig person | Results recorded; sign over 2 m shows last date | BEK 428 §§ 15, 25–27, 97–98 |
| Germany | Yes, after erection or conversion | None fixed; user check before use | Storms, accidents | Longer non-use | Befähigte Person | Kept on site until the next inspection | TRBS 2121-1 section 5 |
| Poland | Acceptance (odbiór) | At least monthly | Strong wind, precipitation | Breaks over 10 days | Site manager or authorised person | Site log or report naming next dates | Dz.U. 2003 poz. 401 §§ 110, 127 |
| Netherlands | Yes | "Regularly"; sector: every 2 weeks | Abnormal weather, every change | Every period of non-use | Ter zake deskundige | Sector steigerkaart only | Arbobesluit 7.34 |
| France | Yes | Daily, plus a thorough check within 3 months | Weather, reassembly, reconfiguration | At least one month | Qualified person | Remedial work in the register | Arrêté 21 Dec 2004, arts. 4–6 |
What to check on the walk-round is covered per country in the checklists for the UK and US, Norway (in Norwegian), Germany (in German), Sweden (in Swedish), Denmark (in Danish) and Poland (in Polish), and in the rules for the Netherlands and France.
Which country is strictest?
It depends on the column.
- Calendar: the US checks every shift. France has two layers: a daily look at the scaffold's condition (art. 5) and a thorough check never older than three months (art. 6).
- Breaks: the Netherlands sets no minimum length. Of the fixed thresholds, Norway's week is shortest, then Poland's 10 days and France's month.
- Paperwork: the UK. The report is due before the end of the working period and lists eight items (Schedule 7).
- Loosest: Denmark's 12-month fallback is the general rule for all technical equipment; on a facade, the event triggers in § 26 come first.

What do "competent", "qualified" and "befähigte Person" mean?
No text names one card. OSHA's competent person in 1926.450(b) must spot hazards and have authority to fix them, so closing the scaffold is part of the role. HSE says competence may come from CISRS or a manufacturer's system training. Germany splits it: a befähigte Person inspects, with Gerüstbaumeister and Polier as examples (TRBS 5.5), while a qualified person does the user check. Denmark adds erection experience (§ 97(2)), and the Dutch A-blad names a trained scaffold inspector or first erector.
What does a weekly or monthly interval mean for a hire contract?
It sets a minimum number of visits, so the order should say who makes them. HSE and the A-blad put inspection on the user; in Sweden the erector checks at handover and the user's employer after that. A six-week UK hire means at least six inspections plus one after each storm; in Poland, every break over 10 days adds a visit.
How should a multi-country team schedule inspections?
Work to the rules where the scaffold stands, not where the crew comes from. Take the local row, use its shortest trigger, and keep one record that holds the Schedule 7 items plus Norway's § 17-10 points: owner, defects with deadlines, signature. In France, firms sharing one scaffold need not repeat the checks, but each must confirm they were done (art. 2). The wider rules are in scaffolding regulations by country.
This comparison is planning information, not structural approval or legal advice. The national texts above and the manufacturer's assembly instructions decide, and a competent person must inspect before anyone uses the scaffold.
Frequently asked questions
How often must a scaffold be inspected under OSHA?
Before each work shift and after any event that could affect its integrity, under 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3), by a competent person. OSHA prescribes no written form, so the tag or log is company practice.
Does a scaffold need re-inspecting after a holiday shutdown?
It depends on the break. Norway requires a check after a week unused, Poland after more than 10 days and France after a month; in the UK the 7-day limit forces one anyway.
Does Germany set a fixed scaffold inspection interval?
No. TRBS 2121-1 ties the formal inspection to erection, conversion and exceptional events, plus a user check before use.
Is a scaff tag enough as an inspection record?
Not in the UK, which needs a written report. Norway and Denmark want a sign with the last inspection date as well; the Dutch steigerkaart is sector practice, not law.
Who inspects a hired scaffold?
Usually the user after handover: HSE says the user or hirer, the A-blad says the user, and in Sweden the user's employer takes over from the erector.
Sources
Primary sources used for this article, with the date each was read.
- The Work at Height Regulations 2005, regulation 12 (inspection of work equipment) (read 24 October 2026)
- The Work at Height Regulations 2005, Schedule 7 (particulars of a report of inspection) (read 24 October 2026)
- HSE: Scaffolding (inspection, competence, reports) (read 24 October 2026)
- 29 CFR 1926.451, General requirements for scaffolds (govinfo, 2024 edition) (read 24 October 2026)
- 29 CFR 1926.450, Scope, application and definitions (eCFR) (read 24 October 2026)
- Lovdata: forskrift om utførelse av arbeid § 17-9 Kontroll av stillas (read 24 October 2026)
- Lovdata: forskrift om utførelse av arbeid § 17-10 Rapport for kontroll av stillas (read 24 October 2026)
- Lovdata: forskrift om utførelse av arbeid § 17-11 Merking av stillas (read 24 October 2026)
- Arbetsmiljöverket: AFS 2023:11, 8 kap. 32–37 §§ (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- Retsinformation: BEK nr. 428 af 05/04/2022 om anvendelse af tekniske hjælpemidler (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- TRBS 2121 Teil 1, Abschnitt 5 Prüfung (BGN-Branchenwissen) (read 24 October 2026)
- Dz.U. 2003 nr 47 poz. 401: rozporządzenie w sprawie bhp podczas wykonywania robót budowlanych (ELI, pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- Wetten.overheid.nl: Arbeidsomstandighedenbesluit, art. 7.34 (version from 1 August 2026) (read 24 October 2026)
- Volandis: A-blad Steigerbouwen (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- OPPBTP: article 2 of the arrêté of 21 December 2004 on scaffold inspections (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- OPPBTP: article 4 of the arrêté of 21 December 2004, inspection before (re)commissioning (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- OPPBTP: article 5 of the arrêté of 21 December 2004, daily inspection (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)
- OPPBTP: article 6 of the arrêté of 21 December 2004, three-monthly inspection (pdf) (read 24 October 2026)